Competition Information
- Competition Name: CommonLit Readability Prize
- URL: https://www.kaggle.com/c/commonlitreadabilityprize/overview
Journals
- Linguistic Features for Readability Assessment – Readability assessment aims to automatically classify text by the level appropriate for learning readers.
- Text as Environment: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Text Readability Assessment Model
- Learning to Predict Readability using Diverse Linguistic Features – In this paper we consider the problem of building a system to predict readability of natural-language documents.
- A Machine Learning Approach to Measurement of Text Readability for EFL Learners Using Various Linguistic Features
- Readability Assessment for Text Simplification – We describe a readability assessment approach to support the process of text simplification for poor literacy readers. Given an input text, the goal is to predict its readability level, which corresponds to the literacy level that is expected from the target reader: rudimentary, basic or advanced.
- Integrating LSA-based hierarchical conceptual space and machine learning methods for leveling the readability of domain-specific texts – Text readability assessment is a challenging interdisciplinary endeavor with rich practical implications. It has long drawn the attention of researchers internationally, and the readability models since developed
have been widely applied to various fields. Previous readability models have only made use of linguistic features employed for general text analysis and have not been sufficiently accurate when used to gauge domain-specific texts. - Deep Learning for Prominence Detection in Children’s Read Speech – A previous well-tuned random forest ensemble predictor is replaced by an RNN sequence classifier to exploit potential context dependency across the longer utterance. Further, deep learning is applied to obtain word-level features from low-level acoustic contours of fundamental frequency, intensity and spectral shape in an end-to-end fashion. Performance comparisons are presented across the different feature types and across different feature learning architectures for prominent word prediction to draw insights wherever possible.
- Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., & Dascalu, M. (2019). Moving beyond classic readability formulas: New methods and new models. Journal of Research in Reading, 42 (3-4), 541-561
- Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D., & Kyle, K. (2017). Predicting text comprehension, processing, and familiarity in adult readers: New approaches to readability formulas. Discourse Processes, 54(5-6), 340-359.
- Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42 (3), 475-493.
- Crossley, S. A., Dufty, D. F., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Toward a new readability: A mixed model approach. In D.S. McNamara and G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 197-202). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- ReadNet: A Hierarchical Transformer Framework forWeb Article Readability Analysis [arxiv] [paperswithcode]
Hierarchical Transformer Network - Supervised and Unsupervised Neural Approaches to Text Readability [paperswithcode]
BERT - Linguistic Features for Readability Assessment [paperswithcode]
BERT + SVM - Text Readability Assessment for Second Language Learners [paperswithcode]
SVM
Tinggalkan Balasan